Considering RC for a team?
RC for teams isn't a packaged Enterprise SKU on a price page. It's a conversation. Almost every knowledge worker now uses AI — only about 5% use it well. The gap isn't training — it's architecture. What we'd build with you depends on what you actually need.
The pattern you're seeing
- 15 premium AI seats, 2-3 doing meaningful work with them
- No shared context between team members' AI usage — everyone reinventing the wheel
- Your best people spend more time on work that doesn't require their judgment than work that does
- AI "strategy" has been "buy seats and hope." No architecture. No governance. No way to measure if it's working.
What we'd want to know
Before a conversation about scale is worth either of our time:
- How many people on the team? What roles?
- What's the actual gap — adoption, coordination, judgment, governance?
- Are you exploring this for the org, or as a champion looking to prove it internally first?
- What's your budget posture — bespoke six-figure engagement, or starting with a Quick Start Audit ($500) to see if RC even fits before committing?
If the answers point to "we want a packaged Enterprise tier from your pricing page" — we don't have one. If the answers point to "we want to figure out together what makes sense" — that's the conversation.
Two paths from here
Champion path — one person on RC at $97/mo proves the value internally over 30-60 days. When they want it for the team, we have a real conversation grounded in their actual experience, not a sales pitch.
Bespoke path — start a conversation directly. Tell us what you're trying to solve. If there's a fit, we'll figure out shape and price together. The Quick Start Audit ($500, 60 minutes with the architect) is the lowest-commitment way to find out.
Questions leaders ask
Is RC available as an Enterprise tier?
Not currently. RC at team scale isn't a packaged SKU; it's a bespoke conversation. The champion path — one person on RC at $97/mo proving value internally over 30-60 days — is usually the right starting move before we have a real team conversation.
How would I know if RC at scale makes sense for my org?
Three signals: (a) you've bought premium AI seats and adoption is flat, (b) your team's AI usage has zero shared context across roles, (c) you can articulate a specific gap (adoption, coordination, governance) beyond "we want to use AI better." If any of those, the conversation is worth starting.
What does the engagement look like?
Bespoke. We don't have a price page for team scale because what we'd build depends on what you actually need. The Quick Start Audit ($500, 60 minutes with the architect) is the lowest-commitment way to figure out if there's a fit before going further. From there, scope and price get defined together.
Can we start with one person and expand?
Yes, and that's usually the right move. One champion on RC at $97/mo for 30-60 days produces a grounded understanding of whether the architecture serves your team. When they want it for the team, we have a real conversation grounded in actual experience, not a sales pitch.